![]() Tanner Morgan could be better, given he’s only completed 56% of his passes so far this season. A running back is often dependent on the big guys up front. Minnesota’s just 89th in Rush Success Rate and 86th in Offensive Line Yards. The Gophers are averaging 4.4 yards per carry, but Ibrahim was torching Ohio State to the tune of 5.4 yards per carry in Week 0. This offense would be on another level if Mohamed Ibrahim wasn’t hurt. Minnesota Golden Gophers Minnesota Offense Bowling Green has currently possessed the ball for 93 minutes to its opponents 87, which also helps explain why it’s thrice covered as underdogs while going 3-0 to the under this season. What may help the Falcons’ defensive success is their offensive game plan. But they’ve also held their opponents to just 3.8 yards per carry, so it’s not all bad. The front seven hasn’t been as effective, finishing outside the top 100 in Rush Success Rate, while allowing almost 170 rush yards per game. The defense returned 71% of their production from last season, per TARP, so maybe this unit’s on an upwards trend. This is good news, considering the Tennessee game was the 10th straight game the Falcons had allowed 30 points or more. The Falcons have held opposing quarterbacks to just a 55% completion percentage and they currently rank 26th in Defensive Pass Success. The defense has been fine, specifically in the secondary. It’s easy to see why the Falcons are 117th in Finishing Drives. The offense is getting stuffed at the third-highest rate in the nation and the Falcons are averaging a whopping 2.1 yards per carry.Īdd those two together, and you’ve found yourself a team that ranks outside the top 100 in offensive explosiveness.īowling Green can dink-and-dunk all it wants, but it won’t stay out of the cellar if it can’t drive the ball.Īgainst Tennessee, the Falcons strung together two consecutive 11-play drives that both resulted in field goals. He currently paces the MAC in attempts (98), completions (70) and yards (716), but he ranks just fourth in yards per attempt (7.2). McDonald isn’t throwing the ball anywhere.Let’s dive in and find the most profitable betting angle for this one.īowling Green Falcons Bowling Green Offenseĭespite Matt McDonald completing 72% of his passes, the Falcons’ offense has managed just 17.3 points per game (118th in FBS) through their first three. ![]() But is Minnesota worth laying that many points against an undefeated ATS team? Given Minnesota’s status as a Power Five team, the Golden Gophers are laying 31 points at the time of writing. However, the Big Ten has flipped that script in recent years, going 23-13 since 2017, including 5-1 in the young 2021 season. the MAC, with Minnesota going 5-8 during that time. Since 2006, the Big Ten is just 91-95-1 ATS vs. The Gophers split against Ohio State and Miami (OH) to start the season but most recently dominated Colorado as 2.5-point underdogs. ![]() Minnesota has won two straight and is 1-1-1 ATS, but it’s played an interesting schedule. While Bowling Green enters this game with just a 1-2 record, it’s 3-0 against the spread (ATS) - a stat that carries much more weight for bettors. Get up-to-the-minute college football odds here. Bowling Green vs. Minnesota Odds Bowling Green Odds
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |